Login

Automated Report

checknebenkosten.de

Generated on October 1, 2025 · Domain: checknebenkosten.de

Instant Audit

See your site the way search engines feel it

Launch a free crawl in under 30 seconds and get a ranked hit-list of fixes that lift speed, visibility, and trust.

Start Free Analysis
Favicon
checknebenkosten.de
2025/10/01
77

Overall Score

92

PageSpeed

88

Website Quality

50

Trust & Security

67

Performance

100

SEO

93

Best Practices

90

Accessibility

Performance
67/100
Largest Contentful Paint
6/25
5.2s
2.5s4.0s
First Contentful Paint
1/10
4.6s
1.8s3.0s
Total Blocking Time
30/30
70ms
200ms400ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
25/25
0.00
0.100.25
Speed Index
5/10
5.6s
3.4s5.4s
SEO
100/100
Page isn’t blocked from indexing
31/31
Document has a `<title>` element
8/8
Document has a meta description
8/8
Page has successful HTTP status code
8/8
Links have descriptive text
8/8
Links are crawlable
8/8
robots.txt is valid
8/8
Image elements have `[alt]` attributes
8/8
Document has a valid `hreflang`
8/8
Document has a valid `rel=canonical`
8/8
Best Practices
93/100
Uses HTTPS
18/18
Avoids deprecated APIs
18/18
Avoids third-party cookies
18/18
Allows users to paste into input fields
11/11
Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load
4/4
Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load
4/4
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
0/4
Serves images with low resolution
0/4
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`
4/4
Document uses legible font sizes
4/4
Page has the HTML doctype
4/4
Properly defines charset
4/4
No browser errors logged to the console
4/4
No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools
4/4
Accessibility
90/100
`[aria-*]` attributes match their roles
6/6
`[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>`
6/6
`[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes
6/6
`[aria-*]` attributes have valid values
6/6
`[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled
6/6
Buttons do not have an accessible name
0/6
Image elements have `[alt]` attributes
6/6
`[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5.
6/6
ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
4/4
Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
4/4
`[role]` values are valid
4/4
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
0/4
Document has a `<title>` element
4/4
`<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute
4/4
`<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute
4/4
Links are distinguishable without relying on color.
4/4
Links have a discernible name
4/4
Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`).
4/4
List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements
4/4
Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing.
4/4
Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
2/2
Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
1/1
Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
1/1
Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text.
1/1

Site Quality

Title
16/20
Nebenkosten zu hoch? Jetzt kostenlos prüfen! | KI-Analyse in 2 Minuten
70 chars (ideal 30–60)
Meta Description
15/15
🔍 KI-gestützte Nebenkostenprüfung nach BetrKV & BGB. Kostenlose Analyse auf Fristen, Fehler & Plausibilität. Sofortige Ergebnisse - jetzt Abrechnung hochladen!
160 chars (ideal 120–160)
Favicon
3/3
Favicon preview
https://checknebenkosten.de/favicon-96x96.png
present
Viewport meta
8/8
width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0
correct (width=device-width, initial-scale=1)
robots.txt
6/6
User-agent: Googlebot Allow: / User-agent: Bingbot Allow: / User-agent: Twitterbot Allow: / User-agent: facebookexternalhit Allow: / User-agent: * Allow: / # Block payment and admin pages from indexing Disallow: /payment-success Disallow: /payment-cancel Disallow: /bundle-success Disallow: /admin Disallow: /activate Disallow: /confirm Disallow: /auth Disallow: /dashboard Disallow: /profile # Block API endpoints and internal paths Disallow: /api/ Disallow: /_next/ Disallow: /*.json$ # Site...
perfect (User-agent + Allow + Sitemap)
Sitemap
7/7
https://checknebenkosten.de/sitemap.xml
present
Headings
0/6
missing (add H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 tags to structure content)
Schema.org JSON-LD
0/2
missing (consider Organization, Article, Product, or FAQPage schemas)
Canonical URL
8/8
https://checknebenkosten.de
present
HTML lang
4/4
de
present
Character encoding
4/4
UTF-8
present

Open Graph

Title
3/3
Nebenkosten zu hoch? Jetzt kostenlos prüfen!
present
Description
3/3
🔍 KI-gestützte Nebenkostenprüfung nach BetrKV & BGB. Kostenlose Analyse auf Fristen, Fehler & Plausibilität. Sofortige Ergebnisse!
present
Image
3/3
Image preview
https://checknebenkosten.de/og-image.png
present
URL
3/3
https://checknebenkosten.de
present
Type
1/1
website
present

Twitter Cards

Card Type
1/1
summary_large_image
present
Title
1/1
Nebenkosten zu hoch? Jetzt kostenlos prüfen!
present
Description
1/1
🔍 KI-gestützte Nebenkostenprüfung nach BetrKV & BGB. Kostenlose Analyse auf Fristen, Fehler & Plausibilität. Sofortige Ergebnisse!
present
Image
1/1
Image preview
https://checknebenkosten.de/og-image.png
present

Security Headers

HTTPS
30/30
HTTPS enabled
HTTP Strict Transport Security
15/15
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Content Security Policy
0/15
missing (should be: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self')
Frame Protection
0/5
missing (should be: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN)
MIME Type Protection
5/5
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

Domain Trust

Domain Rating
0/25
no domain rating found
1525
Domain Age
0/5
no domain age records found
Registrar
no registrar record found
Country
Unknown

Infrastructure

Provider
Cloudflare

FAQs

Report-specific answers

Key takeaways for checknebenkosten.de pulled from this audit.

How often should I refresh the YourWebsiteScore report for checknebenkosten.de?

The latest audit was captured on October 1, 2025.

Re-run the analysis after major deployments or at least once a month so you can spot Core Web Vitals, snippet, or security regressions before they affect rankings or conversions.

Which Lighthouse performance improvements should checknebenkosten.de tackle first?

Largest Contentful Paint (mobile) at 5.2s: reclaim ≈19 points. Optimise hero media, inline critical CSS, and prioritise above-the-fold requests so the primary content renders faster.

First Contentful Paint (mobile) at 4.6s: reclaim ≈9 points. Reduce render-blocking CSS/JS and stream initial HTML so meaningful content appears earlier.

Speed Index (mobile) at 5.6s: reclaim ≈5 points. Trim render-blocking resources, preconnect to critical domains, and focus on above-the-fold rendering to accelerate visual completion.

Which Lighthouse SEO audits should checknebenkosten.de fix first?

Mobile Lighthouse SEO is 100/100. Keep schema, robots directives, and headings tidy so the score stays maxed.

Desktop Lighthouse SEO is 100/100. Keep schema, robots directives, and headings tidy so the score stays maxed.

Which Lighthouse Best Practices should checknebenkosten.de fix first?

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep checknebenkosten.de aligned with modern browser expectations.

Serves images with low resolution (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep checknebenkosten.de aligned with modern browser expectations.

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio (desktop) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep checknebenkosten.de aligned with modern browser expectations.

Which Lighthouse Accessibility audits should checknebenkosten.de fix first?

Buttons do not have an accessible name (mobile) is missing roughly 6 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make checknebenkosten.de easier to use.

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make checknebenkosten.de easier to use.

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. (desktop) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make checknebenkosten.de easier to use.

Which Website Quality issues should checknebenkosten.de fix first?

Headings: missing ≈6 points. Missing (add H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 tags to structure content). Focus on it to lift checknebenkosten.de's Website Quality score.

Title: missing ≈4 points. 70 chars (ideal 30–60). Focus on it to lift checknebenkosten.de's Website Quality score.

Schema.org JSON-LD: missing ≈2 points. Missing (consider Organization, Article, Product, or FAQPage schemas). Focus on it to lift checknebenkosten.de's Website Quality score.

Which Trust & Security fixes should checknebenkosten.de tackle first?

Domain Rating: missing ≈25 points. No domain rating found. Close this gap to raise checknebenkosten.de's Trust & Security score.

Content Security Policy: missing ≈15 points. Missing (should be: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'). Close this gap to raise checknebenkosten.de's Trust & Security score.

Frame Protection: missing ≈5 points. Missing (should be: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN). Close this gap to raise checknebenkosten.de's Trust & Security score.

Instant Audit

See your site the way search engines feel it

Launch a free crawl in under 30 seconds and get a ranked hit-list of fixes that lift speed, visibility, and trust.

Start Free Analysis