FAQs
Report-specific answers
Key takeaways for classif.in pulled from this audit.
How often should I refresh the YourWebsiteScore report for classif.in?
The latest audit was captured on October 6, 2025.
Re-run the analysis after major deployments or at least once a month so you can spot Core Web Vitals, snippet, or security regressions before they affect rankings or conversions.
Which Lighthouse performance improvements should classif.in tackle first?
Largest Contentful Paint (mobile) at 6.9s: reclaim ≈23 points. Optimise hero media, inline critical CSS, and prioritise above-the-fold requests so the primary content renders faster.
Largest Contentful Paint (desktop) at 2.2s: reclaim ≈11 points. Optimise hero media, inline critical CSS, and prioritise above-the-fold requests so the primary content renders faster.
First Contentful Paint (mobile) at 6.4s: reclaim ≈10 points. Reduce render-blocking CSS/JS and stream initial HTML so meaningful content appears earlier.
Which Lighthouse SEO audits should classif.in fix first?
Document does not have a meta description (mobile) is missing roughly 8 points. Fixing it will raise the SEO score and strengthen how classif.in appears in search.
robots.txt is not valid (mobile) is missing roughly 8 points. Fixing it will raise the SEO score and strengthen how classif.in appears in search.
Document does not have a meta description (desktop) is missing roughly 8 points. Fixing it will raise the SEO score and strengthen how classif.in appears in search.
robots.txt is not valid (desktop) is missing roughly 8 points. Fixing it will raise the SEO score and strengthen how classif.in appears in search.
Which Lighthouse Best Practices should classif.in fix first?
Browser errors were logged to the console (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep classif.in aligned with modern browser expectations.
Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep classif.in aligned with modern browser expectations.
Browser errors were logged to the console (desktop) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep classif.in aligned with modern browser expectations.
Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools (desktop) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep classif.in aligned with modern browser expectations.
Which Lighthouse Accessibility audits should classif.in fix first?
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. (mobile) is missing roughly 7 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make classif.in easier to use.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. (desktop) is missing roughly 7 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make classif.in easier to use.
Which Website Quality issues should classif.in fix first?
Meta Description: missing ≈15 points. Missing (add <meta name='description'> with 120-160 chars). Focus on it to lift classif.in's Website Quality score.
Canonical URL: missing ≈8 points. Missing (add <link rel='canonical'> to avoid duplicate content). Focus on it to lift classif.in's Website Quality score.
Headings: missing ≈6 points. Missing (add H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 tags to structure content). Focus on it to lift classif.in's Website Quality score.
Which Trust & Security fixes should classif.in tackle first?
Domain Rating: missing ≈25 points. No domain rating found. Close this gap to raise classif.in's Trust & Security score.
HTTP Strict Transport Security: missing ≈15 points. Missing (should be: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains). Close this gap to raise classif.in's Trust & Security score.
Content Security Policy: missing ≈15 points. Missing (should be: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'). Close this gap to raise classif.in's Trust & Security score.