FAQs
Report-specific answers
Key takeaways for pixedit.pro pulled from this audit.
How often should I refresh the YourWebsiteScore report for pixedit.pro?
The latest audit was captured on October 6, 2025.
Re-run the analysis after major deployments or at least once a month so you can spot Core Web Vitals, snippet, or security regressions before they affect rankings or conversions.
Which Lighthouse performance improvements should pixedit.pro tackle first?
Total Blocking Time (mobile) at 25.1s: reclaim β30 points. Split large JavaScript bundles, defer non-critical scripts, and keep heavy work off the main thread to improve responsiveness.
Total Blocking Time (desktop) at 23.9s: reclaim β30 points. Split large JavaScript bundles, defer non-critical scripts, and keep heavy work off the main thread to improve responsiveness.
Largest Contentful Paint (mobile) at 6.1s: reclaim β22 points. Optimise hero media, inline critical CSS, and prioritise above-the-fold requests so the primary content renders faster.
Which Lighthouse SEO audits should pixedit.pro fix first?
Mobile Lighthouse SEO is 100/100. Keep schema, robots directives, and headings tidy so the score stays maxed.
Desktop Lighthouse SEO is 100/100. Keep schema, robots directives, and headings tidy so the score stays maxed.
Which Lighthouse Best Practices should pixedit.pro fix first?
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Best Practices score and keep pixedit.pro aligned with modern browser expectations.
Which Lighthouse Accessibility audits should pixedit.pro fix first?
Buttons do not have an accessible name (mobile) is missing roughly 6 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make pixedit.pro easier to use.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make pixedit.pro easier to use.
Links do not have a discernible name (mobile) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make pixedit.pro easier to use.
Buttons do not have an accessible name (desktop) is missing roughly 6 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make pixedit.pro easier to use.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. (desktop) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make pixedit.pro easier to use.
Links do not have a discernible name (desktop) is missing roughly 4 points. Fixing it will raise the Accessibility score and make pixedit.pro easier to use.
Which Website Quality issues should pixedit.pro fix first?
Canonical URL: missing β8 points. Missing (add <link rel='canonical'> to avoid duplicate content). Focus on it to lift pixedit.pro's Website Quality score.
Sitemap: missing β7 points. Missing (create sitemap.xml and submit to Google Search Console). Focus on it to lift pixedit.pro's Website Quality score.
robots.txt: missing β6 points. Missing (ideal: User-agent: * + Allow: / + Sitemap). Focus on it to lift pixedit.pro's Website Quality score.
Which Trust & Security fixes should pixedit.pro tackle first?
Domain Rating: missing β25 points. No domain rating found. Close this gap to raise pixedit.pro's Trust & Security score.
Content Security Policy: missing β15 points. Missing (should be: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'). Close this gap to raise pixedit.pro's Trust & Security score.
Frame Protection: missing β5 points. Missing (should be: X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN). Close this gap to raise pixedit.pro's Trust & Security score.